The prospect of a same-sex civil union being held in a church against the will of the church's owners are as likely as the prospect of a Jewish couple compelling a privately-funded church to rent to them for their wedding: nil.
The judge pointed out that current law doesn't forbid it from happening. That's all. That doesn't mean that the series of unlikely events requiring it to happen, and without any change from the legislature, has a greater than 0% chance of coming to pass.
you really underestimate the depravity of homosexuals...for they are hell bent to shut down churches that preach against homosexuality. There are even gay political organizations which send homosexual couples into the services of churches and have them disrupt the service by prolonged kissing carousing in the pews, to the point that they are asked to leave.
http://www.greenisthenewred.com/blog/church-sues-after-being-terrorized-by-gay-kissing/2107/
Certainly, someone who has been infracted as much as you understands that this post is pretty much the textbook definition of trolling, yes?
so, you don't believe it takes depravity to attend a church service for the sole reason to distrupt it with carousing?
I think you understand that this conversation could have been had without you intentionally suggesting that gay people want orgies in churches, are "depraved"
as a group, and news about them should be offered in "
Flamer Red."
