WA-09/SurveyUSA: Rep. Adam Smith (D) is in trouble (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2024, 01:04:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 House Election Polls
  WA-09/SurveyUSA: Rep. Adam Smith (D) is in trouble (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: WA-09/SurveyUSA: Rep. Adam Smith (D) is in trouble  (Read 3765 times)
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW
« on: September 20, 2010, 12:54:38 PM »

This one doesn't surprise me in the least.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2010, 07:18:12 AM »

What to trust, an actual election result or a sketchy SUSA poll? Hmmmmmmm....

Seeing as how they are virtually in agreement, the choice seems rather unnecessary.
Considering that Smith had a 6 point lead with a Green (probably) playing spoiler, and a combined vote total of Republican candidates, it's safe to say that Smith is probably up by more. The general electorate will probably be more Democratic than the primary electorate as well.

     Point taken, though it has now been over a month since the primary. It is not inconceivable that the numbers have moved since then.

ut while Murray's numbers have moved in the opposite direction?

Murray's numbers likely moved because of something Murray did, not because of the national mood. The numbers here are what they are probably because this race has not been localized—it's low enough attention that you're just getting a default set of nationalized numbers. And that's dangerous for Smith.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2010, 10:53:05 AM »

Murray's numbers likely moved because of something Murray did, not because of the national mood. The numbers here are what they are probably because this race has not been localized—it's low enough attention that you're just getting a default set of nationalized numbers. And that's dangerous for Smith.

Well, if Murray was able to move her numbers not only against where she was but also against a countervailing shift in the state or national mood over the time, effectively doubling her movement, then Democrats who have money in the bank may have higher hopes than previously thought.

IMHO, this has always been the case, though it was oft overlooked because of all the surrounding pessimism. Boxer will spend her way to victory, too. Feingold is in trouble, because his principles preclude him from doing so.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW
« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2010, 11:35:17 AM »

You mean, because he's not in some rich donor's pocket and thus has not the kind of money?

I'm not sure where I had gotten the idea that Feingold wasn't accepting PAC money, but that's clearly not the case now -- he's raised a couple million from them this year and isn't hurting for cash. Nevermind.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 15 queries.