Diaz-Balarts: Which is more vulnerable? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 03:54:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Diaz-Balarts: Which is more vulnerable? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Diaz-Balarts: Which is more vulnerable?  (Read 2148 times)
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,548


« on: August 02, 2008, 02:26:17 PM »

Probably Lincoln.  Martinez is very popular and has a solid political base in the district, unlike Garcia. 
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,548


« Reply #1 on: August 02, 2008, 03:19:22 PM »

Probably Lincoln.  Martinez is very popular and has a solid political base in the district, unlike Garcia. 
But he also has the baggage from the trial. His political base is quite similar to Harry Mitchell's in AZ-05. The main differences are that AZ-05 was a little less Republican than FL-21 and Mitchell's home base was diluted by other suburbs where his name ID was much lower.  The scandal factor worked in Mitchell's favor; in FL-21, it may work against the Democratic challenger.

Garcia's background offers little fodder for attack ads, which is immensely helpful to a challenger.

I always think of the AZ-05 race when I think of FL-21.  To say that there was a scandal factor in AZ-05 is really pushing it.  Hayworth may have had some vague ties to Abrahamoff, but it was nothing like in CA-11, FL-16, or PA-10.  Still, Mitchell winning that district was a huge surprise to me on election night. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.