Would the GOP be favored to Hold the House if Obama Wins Re-election? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 06:48:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Would the GOP be favored to Hold the House if Obama Wins Re-election? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Would the GOP be favored to Hold the House if Obama Wins Re-election?  (Read 1468 times)
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,548


« on: December 05, 2010, 11:09:53 PM »

If Obama wins reelection, the House will probably be within single digits. 
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,548


« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2010, 11:32:34 PM »
« Edited: December 05, 2010, 11:38:46 PM by Mr.Phips »

You would need a net gain of 25 seats for the Dems, right?  When's the last time either party saw a net gain of 25 seats or more in a presidential election year?  1980?



But Democrats are coming from a pretty low floor this time.  

In 2004, Republicans gained three.
In 1996, Democrats gained nine.
In 1984, Republicans gained fourteen
In 1972, Republicans gained twelve
In 1964, Democrats gained 38
In 1956, Republicans lost two
In 1948, Democrats gained 75
In 1944, Democrats gained 20
In 1940, Democrats gained five
In 1936, Democrats gained 12
In 1916, Democrats lost 16
In 1904, Republicans gained 44

The average going back to that date is a gain of 18 seats, so that would leave Republicans with a 224-211 majority. 
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,548


« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2010, 11:41:44 PM »

You would need a net gain of 25 seats for the Dems, right?  When's the last time either party saw a net gain of 25 seats or more in a presidential election year?  1980?


But Democrats are coming from a pretty low floor this time. 


I can see quite a few districts that probably are naturally Democratic territory that will likely fall back to them in '12, but not sure how many.

Thinking probably NY-25, MN-08, NH-02, TX-27, PA-11, FL-22, IL-10, IL-17.  That's the easiest of the pickings. 
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,548


« Reply #3 on: December 06, 2010, 12:02:32 AM »

You would need a net gain of 25 seats for the Dems, right?  When's the last time either party saw a net gain of 25 seats or more in a presidential election year?  1980?


But Democrats are coming from a pretty low floor this time. 


I can see quite a few districts that probably are naturally Democratic territory that will likely fall back to them in '12, but not sure how many.

Thinking probably NY-25, MN-08, NH-02, TX-27, PA-11, FL-22, IL-10, IL-17.  That's the easiest of the pickings. 

Getting to +15 with Obama winning the PV would be pretty easy.  It's those last 10 seats that complicate things.

There a lot of seats where if Democrats could get defeated candidates to come back and run, they would probably win back.  CO-03, IN-08, MI-07, NY-13, NM-02, OH-01, PA-07, PA-08, WV-01, VA-05 are among those.  Then there are those like OH-15, NY-19, NY-20, NY-24, NH-01, FL-08, WI-07, and WI-08 that were won by Obama and could be taken back. 

I am taking into account redistricting, hence I dont mention seats like NC-02, OH-18, OH-06, and IN-09. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.