Rothenberg: Democrats could get to 60 Senate seats by 2010 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 09:17:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Rothenberg: Democrats could get to 60 Senate seats by 2010 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Rothenberg: Democrats could get to 60 Senate seats by 2010  (Read 10118 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« on: February 16, 2007, 11:54:19 AM »

60? Can't see it yet. Very much a best case scenario, I guess.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2007, 10:08:57 AM »

Did Thune have an opponent that year, or just an "opponent"?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2007, 10:50:34 AM »

Tell me again, why did Tester only win by about a point?

Because he's a leftie who doesn't fit the state at all. And that makes his victory all the sweeter. Smiley

Then why did Brian Schweitzer almost beat Burns in 2000?

So you're admitting that if Burns didn't make totally outrageous comments and wasn't one of the most recognizably corrupt members of Congress tied to one of the most recognizably corrupt men in the country, Tester would have been owned?
Because Burns already was Burns back in 2000. Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 10 queries.