Quick attempt at a Minnesota gerrymander (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 17, 2024, 03:43:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Quick attempt at a Minnesota gerrymander (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Quick attempt at a Minnesota gerrymander  (Read 1891 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« on: January 05, 2007, 04:07:12 PM »

Here's mine...
Minnesota

County splits done on area (eyeballed)




What'd happen here?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2007, 04:17:10 PM »

This was a version I posted back in 2005. I kept a district entirely in Hennepin and only split Ramsey. All districts are within 0.5% of the ideal size. It even got the BRTD seal of approval back then. Smiley



Voting percentages are based on the two party vote for president in 2004.

CD 1 (SE MN; light blue): very competitive 51.0% R - 49.0% D.

CD 2 (south suburbs/exurbs; yellow):  includes a few Lake Minnetonka suburbs in Hennepin.  55.2% R.

CD 3 (suburban Hennepin; brown):  very competitive 50.3% D - 49.7% R.

CD 4 (St Paul and eastern suburbs; dark green): includes St Paul, Lauderdale, N. St Paul, Gem Lake, Maplewood, and White Bear Lake in Ramsey plus Washington and Chisago. 59.0% D.

CD 5 (Minneapolis and northern Ramsey; blue): includes Minneapolis, St. Anthony, St. Louis Park, Robbinsdale, Brooklyn Center in Hennepin plus all of Ramsey not in CD 4. Solid 70.2% D.

CD 6 (north suburbs/exurbs; red): 56.4% R.

CD 7 (western MN; green):  56.5% R.

CD 8 (NE MN; light yellow):  54.1% D.

Delegation 3 R, 3 D, 2 swing seats.
I'm not sure if Republicans would win CD7 under this, actually. The Congressional race, that is, rather than the presidential one.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2007, 05:00:31 PM »

This was a version I posted back in 2005. I kept a district entirely in Hennepin and only split Ramsey. All districts are within 0.5% of the ideal size. It even got the BRTD seal of approval back then. Smiley



Voting percentages are based on the two party vote for president in 2004.

CD 1 (SE MN; light blue): very competitive 51.0% R - 49.0% D.

CD 2 (south suburbs/exurbs; yellow):  includes a few Lake Minnetonka suburbs in Hennepin.  55.2% R.

CD 3 (suburban Hennepin; brown):  very competitive 50.3% D - 49.7% R.

CD 4 (St Paul and eastern suburbs; dark green): includes St Paul, Lauderdale, N. St Paul, Gem Lake, Maplewood, and White Bear Lake in Ramsey plus Washington and Chisago. 59.0% D.

CD 5 (Minneapolis and northern Ramsey; blue): includes Minneapolis, St. Anthony, St. Louis Park, Robbinsdale, Brooklyn Center in Hennepin plus all of Ramsey not in CD 4. Solid 70.2% D.

CD 6 (north suburbs/exurbs; red): 56.4% R.

CD 7 (western MN; green):  56.5% R.

CD 8 (NE MN; light yellow):  54.1% D.

Delegation 3 R, 3 D, 2 swing seats.
I'm not sure if Republicans would win CD7 under this, actually. The Congressional race, that is, rather than the presidential one.

Peterson is conservative enough with a long history in the district. I'm not sure many other Dems could fit as well.  The SW corner is a particularly conservative area.
I'm assuming Peterson would keep running ad infinitum under this map, though. (Well, until he'd be defeated, anyhow.) He'd face the occasional very serious challenge, of course.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.