Best Supreme Court ruling (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 05:53:35 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Best Supreme Court ruling (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Best Supreme Court ruling  (Read 5445 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« on: January 03, 2005, 09:43:50 AM »
Sympathy vote for Worcester vs Georgia, which president A***ole Jackson refused to enforce. Smiley
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2005, 01:13:57 PM »
Quote from: J. J. on January 03, 2005, 01:12:31 PM
Quote from: 21 Year Old Sex Crazed BRTD on January 03, 2005, 01:07:25 PM
I don't care about state's rights if the right is to pass g idiotic and asinine laws. that's one right states shouldn't have.

Would you point to the section of the Constitution that says a state is prohibited from adopting "g idiotic and asinine laws."  Even though I disagree with this statute, I recognize the right of a state to adopt a law that I regard as moronic.
Now that would make a fine amendment. Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 10 queries.