Cobb, Badnarik, Ohio, New Mexico, and Nevada

[minionofmidas]

The two fringe candidates asked for the recount because they were concerned about voting "irregularities".  Apparently, supposed voting irregularities only took place in Bush states.
When I discover what the irregularities were, I'l let everyone know.

Just check JFern's thread, man.
(Note: There's quite a difference between Irregularities and Fraud, and a whole world of difference between Evidence of Irregularities, and Proof of Fraud.)

You must be logged in to read this quote.

If the aim is to overturn Bush's statewide, and nationwide, victory - yes, waste of time. Bush won.
If the aim is to bring some sanity to the way America votes, well, frankly, every day spent doing something else is a waste of time.

[minionofmidas]

I actually agree with them that a system where there are different standards in different counties for accepting provisional ballots is a problem.

Goes further than that. Different parts of the voting area (in this case, the state) using different ballots is a big enough problem in itself. And it applies almost all over America. So, of course, is not having a national register of voters. Just get that done and all that counterfrauding "challenging" bullsh*t is devoid of any justification.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I haven't checked the site, but judging by what I read from American Liberals, this kind of stuff sounds familiar.
(The operative word being American, btw - American Conservatives are worse in these respects.)

[minionofmidas]

Goes further than that. Different parts of the voting area (in this case, the state) using different ballots is a big enough problem in itself. And it applies almost all over America. So, of course, is not having a national register of voters. Just get that done and all that counterfrauding "challenging" bullsh*t is devoid of any justification.

Are you're saying that I won't be able to vote in Texas elections if I'm not on some national registry?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

All this stuff I hear about people being registered where they don't live, people being registered twice and voting twice etc would be impossible if there'd be some sort of national register. It needn't actually be administered by the feds, it could be done by the states following a uniform standard (and automatically deregistering a person in State A when they register in state B.)
That's what I meant.