1984 Question (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 08:05:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  1984 Question (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1984 Question  (Read 2543 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« on: October 24, 2004, 12:50:46 PM »

That, plus, a badly planned campaign and a lot of bad luck on top.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2004, 07:27:03 AM »

In the final weeks, he must have known it was over - although the extent was probably not readily discernible.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2004, 06:59:37 AM »

Because Reagan understood the electorate better than any of his peers.  Clinton partially did.  No one has since.  Not either Bush, and not Kerry. 

The key to winning is not to sell an ideology or to convince people.  It is to understand where the electorate is at any given moment and to respond to that.  Sometimes that means explaining where the electorate is wrong and convincing them.  But the key is to address the concerns of the people.
"The most successful politician is he who says what everybody is thinking in the loudest voice" TR
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 10 queries.