Why were Lake and Oz considered weak candidates? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2024, 06:25:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Why were Lake and Oz considered weak candidates? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why were Lake and Oz considered weak candidates?  (Read 1509 times)
Born to Slay. Forced to Work.
leecannon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,235
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.78
« on: March 16, 2023, 11:13:41 PM »
Quote from: riverwalk3 on March 16, 2023, 03:50:31 PM
Lake outperformed Masters by 4 points, and Oz outperformed Mastriano by 10. These are not small outperformances in swing states. I bet most people were initially optimistic on Oz when the initial returns saw him outperforming Mastriano by 10 points.

You’re looking at dirt and saying it’s not bad cause it isn’t sh**t
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.