I vote for the most progressive candidate that has a shot of winning.
So by that logic, in Oklahoma next year you'd vote for Inhofe? He'd be the most progressive candidate with a shot at winning, as he is the ONLY one with a chance at winning.
Until Nader is that, no, I won't vote for him.
Nader will never be that, chance at winning or not, because he is not progressive.
The progressive candidate with the best chance of winning, whatever.
And Ralph Nader is more progressive than the Republicans, and many conservative Democrats. A few "nanny-statist" positions does not make you a fascist.