MI: Public Policy Polling: "Not a Swing State" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 05:37:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  MI: Public Policy Polling: "Not a Swing State" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MI: Public Policy Polling: "Not a Swing State"  (Read 1477 times)
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,019
« on: October 31, 2012, 08:48:51 PM »
Wow. Fantastic result!
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,019
« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2012, 08:52:02 PM »
Quote from: J. J. on October 31, 2012, 08:50:18 PM
I am to the point where I think PPP has a fairly large Democratic house effect.

Not really, PPP's results continue to be line with those of all other quality pollsters.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,019
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2012, 12:19:06 AM »
« Edited: November 01, 2012, 12:23:45 AM by Lief »
Quote from: J. J. on November 01, 2012, 12:03:06 AM
Quote from: Lief on October 31, 2012, 08:52:02 PM
Quote from: J. J. on October 31, 2012, 08:50:18 PM
I am to the point where I think PPP has a fairly large Democratic house effect.

Not really, PPP's results continue to be line with those of all other quality pollsters.

MO, NC argue differently.  

Huh? PPP's NC is backed up by Elon and Civitas, two other polling firms actually based in the state. SUSA (which is horrible in NC) and Rasmussen (which is Rasmussen) disagree there. And PPP hasn't polled Missouri in almost two weeks.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 15 queries.