The convention seems to be quite stagnant now. Therefore, to push it along, I think that the following issues should be addressed forthwith:
1. The unicameral or bicameral nature of the legislature.
2. The systems used in the various elections, and also the constituencies for the same.
Thereafter the specifics may be considered.
1. If there is a bicameral legislature I propose that it would be unrealistic to have elections for the lower House, for with 40 seats up for grabs, we don't have enough people to make it competitive.
In the future, we can make it competitive. But when the founding fathers first started the House in real life, the number of seats was not fixed; and so, in our simulation, all registered voters should automatically be considered House members. This of course is kind of like a unicameral legislature, but we dont have enough people to do it otherwise. Otherwise we can just have a unicameral legislature. Of course there will be a minimum number of posts requirement as with voting; this should be raised from 18. If we can trust people to vote, we should be able to trust them to be house members also.
2. Whether we use EVs or popular vote, remember that under a plurality voting system, party A candidate recieved 40%, party B candidate 30% and party C candidate 30%, party A candidate wins, even if party B and C candidates are very similiar to one another. We already have a similiar situation developing in the forum with the Progressive and Democratic parties being similiar. The last election was quite competitive and we should continue to try and achieve competitive (and therefore FUN) elections. Punishing a diversity of viewpoints/parties through a plurality system does not accomplish this.