Incumbent Senators Who Could Have Serious Primary Challengers (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 08:41:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Incumbent Senators Who Could Have Serious Primary Challengers (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Incumbent Senators Who Could Have Serious Primary Challengers  (Read 542 times)
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,062


« on: May 10, 2017, 10:13:38 PM »

Feinstein's challenge could still become serious if she draws a higher-profile opponent from the left, or even if one of the existing ones takes off. With things as they are I wouldn't be surprised if Ro Khanna jumps in. He seems extremely ambitious. However "Progressive male challenging centrist female" will just deepen old wounds and reinforce the divide. I would prefer someone like Sarah Silverman to take identity issues off the table. Although Carper and Menendez would certainly get a primary too if the Sanders wing is serious about changing things.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,062


« Reply #1 on: May 10, 2017, 11:03:11 PM »

Feinstein's challenge could still become serious if she draws a higher-profile opponent from the left, or even if one of the existing ones takes off. With things as they are I wouldn't be surprised if Ro Khanna jumps in. He seems extremely ambitious. However "Progressive male challenging centrist female" will just deepen old wounds and reinforce the divide. I would prefer someone like Sarah Silverman to take identity issues off the table. Although Carper and Menendez would certainly get a primary too if the Sanders wing is serious about changing things.
Khanna won't run after just one term in the House. You think Feinstein will lose to some Berniecrat who currently doesn't have any name recognition among the general population?

No offense to our proud Vermonters here, but Bernie himself started off with no name recognition.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,062


« Reply #2 on: May 10, 2017, 11:05:48 PM »

Even if you're playing devil's advocate, there is no comparing California to Vermont.

In your mind, I am thinking of some obscure Bernie challenge to Vermont's incumbent Senator in 2006?
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,062


« Reply #3 on: May 10, 2017, 11:34:59 PM »

Uh guys, I was referring to his presidential campaign. The irony of saying "You think Feinstein will lose to some Berniecrat who currently doesn't have any name recognition among the general population?" is that Bernie himself had no name recognition among the national population before his insurgent campaign for president in 2015-2016. Hence the term Berniecrat to begin with. Anyone, elected official, celebrity, tech mogul, all of which California has in spades, still has time to jump into the race against Feinstein and win. I'm not saying it will happen, but it easily could, moreso than most people think.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.