illinois? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 05:32:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  illinois? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: illinois?  (Read 2486 times)
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,024


« on: December 20, 2004, 08:55:51 PM »

It's because the "Collar Counties" (the ring surrounding Cook) are nowhere near as Republican as they used to be, and without the old numbers they used to give Republicans, it's almost impossible to outvote Chicago. Unless the trend in these counties goes back to the Republicans, we can count on Illinois.

And California and New York are not trending Republican.

Although the collar counties contributed to the democratization of Illinois, I think the real gain cam in Cook County.  Look at these results of the Dem versus the Repub:

2004: Kerry + 41.1
2000: Gore + 40
1996: Clinton + 40.1
1992: Clinton + 30
1988: Dukakis + 12.4
1984: Mondale + 2.6
1980: Carter + 12.4
1976: Carter + 8.7
1972: McGovern - 7.4
1968: Humphrey + 9.5
1964: Johnson + 26.4
1960: Kennedy +13.1

Carter couldn't win the state in 1976 because he was only at + 8.7, but Kennedy won by 13.1 and won the state.

The same trend occurs in other urban areas of the nation. Take for example Philadelphia county:

2004: Kerry + 61.1 (win)
2000: Gore + 62.1 (win)
1996: Clinton + 61.4 (win)
1992: Clinton + 47.3 (win)
1988: Dukakis + 34.2 (loss)
1984: Mondale + 30.3 (loss)
1980: Carter + 24.7 (loss)
1976: Carter + 34.3 (win)
1972: McGovern - 11.1 (loss)
1968: Humphrey + 31.2 (win)
1964: Johnson + 47.2 (win)
1960: Kennedy +36.2 (win)

Kerry's margin in Philadelphia: 412,000
Kerry's margin in Pennsylvania: 144,000
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,024


« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2004, 08:58:17 PM »

By the way, the strategy for the GOP is clear. Evidence suggests that partisans who are surrounded by a heavily hostile environment tend to become discouraged. They lose interest in politics, participate less, and feel themselves inefficious. Thus when it comes to balloting time they turn out less. This applies to Democrats in rural areas as well as Republicans in cities.

However, the GOP seems to have gotten the message: in 2004 it heavily increased GOP turnout in Democratic areas in South Florida, critically reducing Democratic margins there, while the Democrats failed dismally to mobilize rural voters.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.