Have fun Republicans (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 02:23:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Have fun Republicans (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Have fun Republicans  (Read 6985 times)
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,024


« on: November 28, 2004, 05:06:33 AM »

Suppose you are a registered Democrat living in Alabama and switch your party over to Republican. If you are like most people, you are probably not going to run out to the DMV and ask for your voter registration card back just so you can erase the x mark next to "Democrat" and check "Republican".

You are simply going to start voting Republican and saying that you're a Republican in public opinion polls. Which is why voter registration should be taken with a grain of salt. Change in that department is even more glacial than the Republican re-alignment in the South that took place 1964-2004.

I basically agree with Gustaf's analysis. The 1992 election was a partial re-alignment ending the Republican lock on the Presidency. Clinton started something, but he didn't really finish it.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,024


« Reply #1 on: November 28, 2004, 05:39:28 AM »

Suppose you are a registered Democrat living in Alabama and switch your party over to Republican. If you are like most people, you are probably not going to run out to the DMV and ask for your voter registration card back just so you can erase the x mark next to "Democrat" and check "Republican".

You are simply going to start voting Republican and saying that you're a Republican in public opinion polls. Which is why voter registration should be taken with a grain of salt. Change in that department is even more glacial than the Republican re-alignment in the South that took place 1964-2004.

True up to a point, but even if (say) 5% of Democrats in any of those states are "really" Republicans, Democrats would still vastly outnumber Republicans in all of those states.

The reason why I brought this up, was because danwxman said:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Now, unless there's a new meaning to "partisan", if this were true, Kerry would have won landslides in all four states.
He didn't, so it isn't.

True, but can the Democrats do a complete 180 and suddenly go back to the party that they were in 1968? To do so would require a very left-wing economic policy, basically a resumption of the war on poverty, etc. On the other hand they would have to virtually abandon key social issues like abortion. While the elimination of social issues might benefit Democrats, reality is that now that that can of worms has been opened, it will not just go away.

That is the only way I can see of them ever re-gaining those votes, but it's unlikely ever to happen. It's more likely that those registrations are just ghosts of the past, and are going to keep declining, slowly but surely.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,024


« Reply #2 on: November 28, 2004, 05:55:44 AM »

True, but can the Democrats do a complete 180 and suddenly go back to the party that they were in 1968? To do so would require a very left-wing economic policy, basically a resumption of the war on poverty, etc. On the other hand they would have to virtually abandon key social issues like abortion.

Seems like a good idea if they want to win elections

Possibly a good point. It wouldn't fit all my positions very well but you may be correct. However unlikely.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 13 queries.