Military service should be a negative thing for candidates. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 03:23:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Military service should be a negative thing for candidates. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Military service should be a negative thing for candidates.  (Read 2776 times)
Bay Ridge, Bklyn! Born and Bred
MikeyCNY
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,181


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: -4.87

« on: June 30, 2008, 06:08:52 PM »

A real logical system would be treating military service in their background as a negative for candidates. Let's face it they couldn't get into college/find a job so they went into the military. Dropping out of society for several years to be a hired gun for the federales? Not exactly the mark of a stable personality IMO.   


Speaking only for myself, I enlisted specifically for the educational benefits so I could pay for college once I seperated, and I hardly "dropped out of society" since I was stationed overseas and saw some pretty neat places.  Experiences I wouldn't trade for anything else in the world.  I think you have a slightly warped sense of military personnel overall;  probably gleaned your opinions from playing Grand Theft Auto and thinking we're all like Republican Space Rangers or something.   lol

PS: the pols like McCain, Webb, JFK, Kerry, etc., don't enlist.   They recieve commissions, which means they already have a college education, which makes your point moot.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 10 queries.