Ruth Bader Ginsburg hospitalized for possible infection (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 07:57:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Ruth Bader Ginsburg hospitalized for possible infection (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Ruth Bader Ginsburg hospitalized for possible infection  (Read 2786 times)
Hammy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,702
United States


« on: July 17, 2020, 08:36:25 PM »

Ginsburg didnt retire in 2014, when Obama had the Senate, due to the fact, she expected Hilary to be elected as Prez. That's what Bill Clinton told Ginsburg

She miscalculated . Also, she expected Kennedy to retire and it would have been 6 to 3 Liberal than reversed


90-95% of problems Dems have had over the past 30 years can be directly attributed to Bill and Hillary Clinton. They are such a massive metastatic cancer.

LOL

Single dumbest thing I’ve ever read on this site, which is really saying something.

Bill Clinton saved the Democratic Party. Three elections in a row, Dems not only lost but were slaughtered in landslides. The party was on the verge of oblivion at the presidential level. Bill broke through and won, won big, and became a great and popular president in his own right. How the hell could he have possibly predicted a Supreme Court justice he nominated would get cancer and not retire early enough decades later, under the first black president but before Donald Trump became president? The things people blame the Clintons for are ridiculous. It’s like “Thanks, Obama” times 1000.

Only on the presidential level. On the congressional level Democrats were destroyed and since his presidency we have only held the house for 5 years, (2007-2011,2019-)
It's not even worth arguing with this guy. He frequently posts at r/neoliberal....

He probably supports open borders and thinks Bill Clinton was a good guy.

I mean Clinton was a great President, but my point still stands, he didn’t exactly “save” the Democratic Party.

I'm not even sure what part of presiding over the Dems control of the legislature completely imploding even counts as "saving the Democratic Party" in the first place. He did nothing but hand the Republicans a quarter century of ammo and in effect if not for him we wouldn't have Trump (who remember he was all buddy buddy with for decades).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.