Trump approval ratings thread, 1.4

[Hammy]

Rass tweeting out daily #'s of Trump supposed black JA which they say is 36%, amazingly Trump only manages a 49% approval rating overall with numbers like that. I'm starting to think we may have another Research 2000 situation.

If Trump's approval amongst blacks is 36%, his JA would be WAY above 49%... which means their black sample is very small

Wouldn't surprise me at all if their sample consisted of three people or something.

[Hammy]

Texas: Marist/NBC News, Aug. 12-16, 970 adults including 759 registered voters

Among adults:

Approve 43 (strongly 30)
Disapprove 46 (strongly 36)

Among RV:

Approve 47 (strongly 33)
Disapprove 45 (strongly 36)

GCB (RV only): R 46, D 43

Wow, those are awful support numbers for Texas.

[Hammy]

Huh weird that no one has posted the Reuters/Ipsos numbers for this week!

Disapprove: 56 (+3)
Approve: 38 (-5)

http://polling.reuters.com/#!response/CP3_2/type/week/dates/20180301-20180828/collapsed/true

Hasn't Reuters been having a horrible D bias in their polls lately?

[Hammy]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Nobody has learned anything from 2016. I’m not going to sigh relief until the checkmark is put up.

It would be something to win two elections in a row that you weren't supposed to win.

That kind of smug entitlement complex played a big part in our 2016 loss, which is why I'm tempering my hopes for 2018. Dems have been counting their chickens for months now even though the third-degree burns from two years ago haven't even healed yet.

Brand new account? Check

Red avatar? Check

Extremely imaginative language used to criticize Dems? Check

"I'm not like those smug entitled Democrats"? Check.

Oh no, somebody dare post something that isn't an unquestioning cult-like praise of The Party! Whatever shall we do!

[Hammy]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Nobody has learned anything from 2016. I’m not going to sigh relief until the checkmark is put up.

It would be something to win two elections in a row that you weren't supposed to win.

That kind of smug entitlement complex played a big part in our 2016 loss, which is why I'm tempering my hopes for 2018. Dems have been counting their chickens for months now even though the third-degree burns from two years ago haven't even healed yet.

Brand new account? Check

Red avatar? Check

Extremely imaginative language used to criticize Dems? Check

"I'm not like those smug entitled Democrats"? Check.

Oh no, somebody dare post something that isn't an unquestioning cult-like praise of The Party! Whatever shall we do!

That was a sock account made to make dems look stupid.

As anyone could have guessed judging by the language. But whenever Dems disregard overly dramatic criticisms of the party then suddenly we're cultist. Awwwlright.

The problem is you disregard any criticism. And this being Atlas, overly dramatic posts are tradition.

[Hammy]

https://twitter.com/gelliottmorris/status/1056967755545632769

Another fine example of R projection: they conduct fake polls to fit their narrative, so in return, anything that doesn't is clearly a fake poll.