The nation is growing you know, of course the turnout this year was nice, but the real list you should look at is that:
What are those figures - turnout as a percentage of what? I imagine non-citizens and felon populations are higher than ever, although how is earlier disenfranchisement taken into account?
That's just the percentage of popular vote each candidate got.
Exectly
Oh, I see. But how is that more relevant than raw vote figures? Peculiarities of the campaign and, especially, weak opponents (1964, for example) really affect the margins.
The original thought exercise in this topic was to consider 2008 vote totals as compared to 2004 vote totals, to consider that McCain received fewer votes than Kerry even as the population grew slightly.