England Turning Resentful of Scottish Desire for Independence (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 27, 2024, 06:50:22 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  England Turning Resentful of Scottish Desire for Independence (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should the Union between England and Scotland be dissolved?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 25

Author Topic: England Turning Resentful of Scottish Desire for Independence  (Read 8065 times)
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,853
Ireland, Republic of


« on: July 22, 2008, 03:03:17 PM »

Thanks again Jas. It does not appear at this juncture that FF and FG really vary to any significant degree. One would think that over time that they would reconstitute into center left and center right parties, ala the UK.

Maybe so, but I'd be doubtful and there's been little sign of it so far.

To my mind, FG are already a centre-right party, hamstrung by the fact that they can never win enough seats to enter government without the centre-left Labour party and so possibly coming off to many as more centrist than they really are. Certainly from his pronouncements to date, the current leader is a sort of standard law & order conservative type leader (if a bit gormless).

FF are almost anti-ideological, maybe somewhat populist. Their stance depends a great deal on their leader's direction moreso than any real core beliefs. They too are strongly affected by their coalition partners. Socially centrist to right leaning, economically centrist (though with members along the spectrum from centre-left to centre-right).

Neither party has any sort of litmus test or issue of credo, at least not anymore. Too a great extent party identification for many members (and indeed many of their elected representatives) is clearly simply a matter of family history rather than any actual political beliefs. Both are rather big-tent operations which can easily accomodate any reasonably moderate type characters.

(Another factor to consider may be that our system of election (PR-STV) seems to favour moderates (IMO) moreso than other electoral methods.)

To a significant extent it is Ireland's smaller parties as necessary coalition partners who so often find themsleves steering the ship of government. The Progressive Democrats for example (set up in the 1980s from defectors from both FF and FG) have arguably been the most influential party in government over the past 2 decades - responsible for setting in place a pro-business , low direct tax economy which has become accepted by pretty much all parties with elected representation as the correct framework to have in place - this despite the fact that they have only occasionally managed to get double digit representation in the Irish parliament and are currently on the verge of extinction.

I disagree - you can't (anymore) use any sort of scale to place either FG or FF. Its just that FF is the "power party" who like all such parties doesn't actually have an ideology (but likes to pretend it does) other than those related to patronage and the social\cultural ideas of the time (Protectionist Jacobinism in the 1930s, Keynesian Conservatism in the 60s/70s, Free Market Friedmanism plus the parish pump now).

FG is just a party of conservative and liberal-conservative lawyers and businessmen. In many ways its opinions are actually closer to that of the "establishment" than that of many members of FF. Though perhaps I am wrong on this, I was surprised to note that the majority of identified FG voters voted no in the referendum.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,853
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2008, 03:14:38 PM »

Gully, your description of FF is quite reminescent of United Russia. Can a limited parallel be drawn?

Don't really know enough to comment but I usually think FF is more like the LDP of Japan, or the Pre-90s PRI of Mexico or even the Christian Democrats of Italy in the Cold War era (though obviously less eh.. fascist)
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,853
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2008, 03:35:32 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I aim to please. Cheesy

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I never said it did. Perhaps I should have made it clear than being in FF is a more a "career" than anything else. That is of course true for all the political parties but FF due to its nature is always going to have pure careerists in it (and will thus be more corrupt).

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I don't disagree but...

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

That was my initial point. FF (and FG) just ride the currents of Irish society. FF's position on Divorce perhaps gives the best showing on this.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Nah. FF is the party of the Irish State; the divergence of the opinions of its leaders (since De Valera left the scene anyway) has not really changed that much except to exacebate the populist or conservative elements and tendencies within the party depending on who is leader. With Cowen now number 1 there is a much less conservative ethos to FF than was the status quo under Ahern.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.