States that you don't see going R or D in the next 2 decades? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 12:43:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  States that you don't see going R or D in the next 2 decades? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: States that you don't see going R or D in the next 2 decades?  (Read 1239 times)
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,117
United States


« on: March 08, 2020, 06:34:46 PM »
Quote from: Pro-Life Single Issue Voter on March 08, 2020, 06:13:22 PM
Quote from: Old School Republican on March 08, 2020, 12:46:47 AM
Quote from: Pro-Life Single Issue Voter on March 07, 2020, 12:19:50 PM
I don't see any landslides in the next 5 elections and don't believe in #trends continuing indefinitely, so, maybe something like this, give or take Virginia, Georgia, North Carolina, and Ohio:



That map looks way way to stable for a two decades time.
I disagree.  20 years is 5 elections.  This would be the results for the last 5 elections, since 2000:



The 2000 to 2020 electoral map may look fairly stable, but go back one more election and you have KY, TN, LA, AR, WV and MO going for Clinton.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.