Why did it take until 2018 to sink most Clinton seat Republicans? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2024, 05:21:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Why did it take until 2018 to sink most Clinton seat Republicans? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did it take until 2018 to sink most Clinton seat Republicans?  (Read 1430 times)
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,162
United States


« on: May 08, 2019, 11:46:15 AM »
A lot of those suburban districts were traditionally Republican (IL-06, KS-03, NJ-07, TX-07, TX-32, VA-10, all of the Southern California ones), and had voted for Romney. Hillary won them because Trump was such a bad fit for suburbanites - Kasich, Jeb! or Rubio would have likely kept them in the GOP column.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 11 queries.