Poll - Alabama Evangelicals more likely to vote for Moore after new allegations

[Ban my account ffs!]

And the liberal media is bad - Why? Because they can't have slaves. Is it pure coincidence that the biggest supporters of slavery were these Evangelical Southern ex-Confederate White guys.

This is dumb analysis.

You don't have the intelligence to comment about dumbness, you barely have the intelligence to be a rational poster. Now quit stalking me by making idiotic posts after every thread of mine when you have nothing to say but irrelevant opinions.

It is always amusing how dumbfu**ks without much intelligence feel can insinuate that others are dumb & feel proud about it. Shadows, I know you are seeing this but I hope if you are born again, your combined IQ in 2 lifetimes will exceed mine. I have great education qualifications, I earn a lot of money & I hold a good/high management position in possibly the most iconic organizations in the world whose office you should go & visit in your state (& wave from a distance). And I have only just started.

Maybe someday, I will buy whatever company you work for & make you work under me.

Whatever Timmy.  You're just a short munchkin who skateboards around from pool to pool eating In-n-Out and pretending to be a surfer dude even though you can't even float on a paddleboard in a calm pool.  Your double digit IQ is as utterly unimpressive as your knowledge of every possible combination available at the Wienerschnitzel.  It's just hotdogs, bruh.  You should really strive harder than just good/high because this is Atlas.  We have high standards and we are not going to compromise just to make your loser butt feel better.

Maybe some day I will buy you a membership to Restoration Hardware so you can pretend to have good taste in poorly built, over priced furniture and impress nobody.

[Ban my account ffs!]

First off, I disagree with multiple posters here who say that more likely/ less likely polls are meaningless. This is way too high a percentage to Simply write off as knee-jerk positive responses for one's own candidate. Even such knee-jerk responses are bad enough as it is as it reflects someone being absolutely deaf dumb and blind to the facts and world around them.

Well, they're bad, yes, but the question is about how do we interpret them.  I just don't trust any poll respondent to answer honestly when asked "Does X make you more or less likely to support your candidate?"  They're not going to answer honestly.  They may not even be capable of answering honestly, because they might not know.  They might just take in any scrap of data and figure that it makes them more likely to support their candidate of choice, even when it doesn't.  Or they could just be reading the poll question as a chance to give a "symbolic" show of support to their candidate.

I would agree that this is tribalism at its finest.  The deranged tribalism of evangelicals leads them to either not believe Moore did what he is accused of doing, to minimize what he did with excuses (40 years ago, no sexual intercourse, but ABORTION AND HILLARY, etc), or simply agreeing there is nothing wrong at all with what he did because, you know, Joseph and Mary and Jesus...

It's not hard to figure out.