Looking at one particular answer Comey gave today which raises questions
"They [the Russians] were unusually loud in their intervention. It’s almost as if they didn’t care that we knew."
He's referring here to the 'fingerprints' of the hacking which were undisguised and blatant. Now someone might look at that and think that that's some kind of false flag. Or Comey has an alternative explanation
“I don’t know the answer for sure. Their number one mission is to undermine the credibility of the entire democracy enterprise. Of this nation. Their loudness in a way would be counting on us to amplify... and freaking people out.”
What? So he's saying that the Russians hacked the DNC so that they'd get caught hacking the DNC and as a result people would lose faith in Democracy because reasons and then that would help Putin because reasons. That's the most absurd nonsense I ever heard.
I'm not the FBI. If there is evidence, they will have it. Until then, boldly proclaiming there is no evidence is premature.
