oh ffs sjws, saying "bride" and "groom" on one form and having gender neutral terms on an other is the same as Jim Crow now?
Never ceases to amaze me how little capability some people have for understanding that not everything to do with thousands of years of marriage traditions is rooted in animus for gay people.
But of course you don't give a sh**t about traditions that don't specifically cater to your personal feelings. And so the words "bride" and "groom" are now considered hate speech when referring to a marriage between a man and a woman. The gay rights movement has been taken over by Jacobinism, dedicated to uprooting any traditional understanding of gender as it relates to marriage by root and branch, and by power of the sword if necessary.
If you think use of gendered language on a marriage license for different-sex couples hurts same-sex couples in such a way that has the slightest comparability to the type of systematic discrimination that actually had concrete implications for millions of blacks and other minorities in terms of the type of education they could get or where they were allowed to live, then the most generous thing I can conclude is that you are a historical illiterate.
Yeah...gays were never discriminated against systematically... And I should be grateful that, in the opinion of a straight southern white guy, that Gays apparently never had it as bad as the blacks. I guess it must be easier to tell up there on top of your pile of bullsh**t.
I'm the historically illiterate one? Puh-lease.
