You seem to neglect two very strong positive feedback systems: the release of methane from previously frozen permafrost, and the decreased albedo effect caused by shrinking ice coverage.
By acting to trap energy, these molecules increase the average kinetic energy of the system, aka of the temperature of the atmosphere.
oh yes. we've known about these possible positive feedback loops for a long time.
But it doesn't explain why Antarctic sea ice is growing or why methane increases slowed way down in the past 15 years.
We're discovering new negative feedbacks every day.
Like the high concentration of greenhouse gases in the mid-troposphere above the tropics causing an increase in the convection rate... which quickly shuffles any excess heat upwards and polewards where it then radiates into space before ever causing any surface warming.
There is also evidence that a stadium wave effect of several different atmospheric and oceanic cycles leads to 30 year periods of warming and cooling planetwide... but especially in the northern hemisphere, and especially even more in the nroth Atlantic.
This theory posits that we reached the peak of warmth around 2000 and will now see the cooling trend until 2030.
This means that the periods of planet warming.. 1910-1940 and 1970-2000... were exacerbated by this stadium wave effect. So to get the underlying warming trend, one must subtract peak from peak and trough from trough... rather than cherry picking peak minus trough like the alarmists do... by choosing 1970 or 1850 for starting points... and then using models that only include data up to 2000 because data after 2000 reduces sensitivity and thus future warming predictions.
Once you do this, you find that the planet has been warming around 0.7C/century for quite some time now... having warmed just as rapidly prior to serious global industrialization (1910-1940) as after (1970-2000)... but most importantly... as emissions absolutely exploded after 2000 with China's epic growth... the planet didn't warm.
MalaspinaGold... I'm not forgetting anything with the climate debate. I have an almost autistic obsession with this issue and you nor harry nor anybody on
this website is going to change my mind.
I'm well aware of the posited positive feedback loops of reduced albedo due to ice and snow loss and the impact of thawing permafrost on atmospheric methane concentrations.
I'm also aware that despite the "fears" of scientists regarding these things... their worst fears simply aren't coming true. Period.
That means there are negative feedbacks in play that we haven't yet discovered or we have but have underestimated their potency.