Trump vows to end birthright citizenship if re-elected

[Xeuma]

Probably not 5 votes on the court to support this, but you know Alito and Thomas would be all for it.

No, I do not know that, and such comments only exemplify that the average person on the left has no mental model of how people on the right think, even when given access to innumerable writings showing how they think. Its quite honestly astonishing how little grasp y'all have on the conversation mindset with how much text is dedicated here to debunking/dismantling/bashing it.

[Xeuma]

Probably not 5 votes on the court to support this, but you know Alito and Thomas would be all for it.

No, I do not know that, and such comments only exemplify that the average person on the left has no mental model of how people on the right think, even when given access to innumerable writings showing how they think. Its quite honestly astonishing how little grasp y'all have on the conversation mindset with how much text is dedicated here to debunking/dismantling/bashing it.

If you want to argue Thomas and Alito have actual judicial philosophies in the face of the clear examples of them flip flopping on past positions in recent years in order to benefit the current republican positions you can be my guest

I won't argue for Alito, since he does appear to me as somewhat of a hack, but even his judicial philosophy is absolutely fascinating (e.g., he was the sole dissent on a case somewhat like Skokie v. National Socialists of American, if I think of it later I'll edit accordingly). Thomas, however, has a very idiomatic jkdicialism, but he follows it wherever it leads, and I'm not aware of any case where he strays from it. You have any examples?

EDIT: The case was Snyder v. Phelps, where Alito was the sole dissent. He would have awarded damages to the family of a dead solider whose funeral was picketed by the Westboro Baptist Church.

[Xeuma]

Probably not 5 votes on the court to support this, but you know Alito and Thomas would be all for it.

No, I do not know that, and such comments only exemplify that the average person on the left has no mental model of how people on the right think, even when given access to innumerable writings showing how they think. Its quite honestly astonishing how little grasp y'all have on the conversation mindset with how much text is dedicated here to debunking/dismantling/bashing it.

If you want to argue Thomas and Alito have actual judicial philosophies in the face of the clear examples of them flip flopping on past positions in recent years in order to benefit the current republican positions you can be my guest

I won't argue for Alito, since he does appear to me as somewhat of a hack, but even his judicial philosophy is absolutely fascinating (e.g., he was the sole dissent on a case somewhat like Skokie v. National Socialists of American, if I think of it later I'll edit accordingly). Thomas, however, has a very idiomatic jkdicialism, but he follows it wherever it leads, and I'm not aware of any case where he strays from it. You have any examples?

EDIT: The case was Snyder v. Phelps, where Alito was the sole dissent. He would have awarded damages to the family of a dead solider whose funeral was picketed by the Westboro Baptist Church.

Well for starters Thomas ruled Trump didn’t need to for go through a disposition in relation to the Stormy trial when he was still president even though he said Bill Clinton had to for Monica

I don't recall this case, but any googling returns results for the documents seized from Mar-a-Lago. Can you link it?