NC Senate 1984 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 03:36:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  NC Senate 1984 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Sen. Jesse Helms (R)
 
#2
Gov. Jim Hunt (D)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 50

Author Topic: NC Senate 1984  (Read 1764 times)
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


« on: October 04, 2014, 05:35:38 PM »

Helms (likes limited government, sound money, and opposes political correctness)
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2014, 05:54:29 PM »

Helms (likes limited government, sound money, and opposes political correctness)

Political correctness is better than overt racism.

Even assuming that Helms may have actually been racist (which seems suspect, given the most common examples of such seem to be removed from their proper context), if there any evidence that such a predisposition mainfested itself in his record as a legislator? To my knowledge, Helms never introduced legislation proposing to infringe upon the rights of African-Americans, or any other ethnic group, but merely opposed the granting of special favors to certain groups.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2014, 10:03:17 AM »

Helms was whistling dixie in front of Carol Moseley Braun. Come on man. Some behavior is just completely unacceptable from a U.S. Senator.

So Helms is to be considered a racist if others within earshot interpret racial malice in words that are not themselves racist? That seems to open a slippery slope into the nonsense of microaggression.

Helms (likes limited government, sound money, and opposes political correctness)

Political correctness is better than overt racism.

Even assuming that Helms may have actually been racist (which seems suspect, given the most common examples of such seem to be removed from their proper context), if there any evidence that such a predisposition mainfested itself in his record as a legislator? To my knowledge, Helms never introduced legislation proposing to infringe upon the rights of African-Americans, or any other ethnic group, but merely opposed the granting of special favors to certain groups.

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

He's one of the worst in modern American politics. The fact that he served so long astounds me, but what astounds me even more are the people that would consider voting for him.

None of the anecdotes in that Wikipedia article are inconsistent with my opinion of Helms. Given that Helms's views in favor of limited government have been misconstrued as racist, it would be helpful if the article actually cited some of this "racially-charged language" so that the reader could decide for himself the alleged racial undertones contained therein, rather than simply taking the Wikipedia editor's word for it that the content must have been racist.

But, in any case, it seems that the animosity towards Helms merely uses racism as a red herring for opposing his political views. It is more convenient to simply accuse an opponent of racism than to have an intellectual debate about the merit of affirmative action or granting special privileges to extant members of a demographic minority based on discrimination of others of that same minority in the past, at the expense of those who did not perpetrate the original injustice.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2014, 07:07:30 PM »

Helms was whistling dixie in front of Carol Moseley Braun. Come on man. Some behavior is just completely unacceptable from a U.S. Senator.

So Helms is to be considered a racist if others within earshot interpret racial malice in words that are not themselves racist? That seems to open a slippery slope into the nonsense of microaggression.

Are you saying that Helms didn't intend to offend Braun, she just chose to be offended?

Essentially, yes.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


« Reply #4 on: October 06, 2014, 10:40:40 AM »

Helms was whistling dixie in front of Carol Moseley Braun. Come on man. Some behavior is just completely unacceptable from a U.S. Senator.

So Helms is to be considered a racist if others within earshot interpret racial malice in words that are not themselves racist? That seems to open a slippery slope into the nonsense of microaggression.

Are you saying that Helms didn't intend to offend Braun, she just chose to be offended?

Essentially, yes.

Wow.

Nice job omitting the accused's explanation of the event. But, it is perfect acceptable to assume the perpetrator of character assassination is 100% truthful in a he-said-she-said situation, so long as we find the accused's political views distasteful, n'est pas? After all, it is not like Helms's accuser in this case has a history of making allegations of racism against political opponents.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 14 queries.