Support for Atlasia's Soldiers Bill (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 05:43:12 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Support for Atlasia's Soldiers Bill (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Support for Atlasia's Soldiers Bill  (Read 4030 times)
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

« on: September 30, 2005, 11:03:33 PM »

Can people please give less propagandised names to their bills?

No.

Besides, how is increasing soldiers' pay not supporting them?
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2005, 11:14:01 PM »

I'm strongly in favor of this but I believe we should clarify "a zone of special danger".

Thank you for your support as well as your question, Senator.

A zone of special danger is actually a rather specific term, as far as the insurance industry and the Atlasian government is concerned.  The Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act of 1927 established the concept.

I can provide more specific information on this area of law, on which I am actually quite knowledgeable, having written several briefs on it.
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

« Reply #2 on: October 01, 2005, 10:37:16 AM »

Anyway Section 3 really needs to go and I found a better way to phrase my amendment:

Section 3 is hereby stricken from the bill.

I would perhaps consider revising Section 3 such that its only effect will be to eliminate the Solomon Amendment.
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

« Reply #3 on: October 01, 2005, 10:44:10 AM »

If some who supported abolishing the NEA and the NEH also oppose this spending increase, then I congratulate those people for being consistent.

With all due respect, Senator Gabu, I do not believe that financing government-mandated "art" and affording military families a decent living in return for their tremendous sacrifices are nearly equivalent.


Also, thank you, Senator Ebowed, for coming to my defense.  Very well said.
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

« Reply #4 on: October 01, 2005, 03:38:11 PM »

After thinking about I'll drop my amendment and do this instead.

Section 3 is hereby replaced with: "The Solomon Amendment is hereby repealed.

I will support this amendment.

Reasoned compromise pleases me.
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

« Reply #5 on: October 03, 2005, 02:42:53 PM »
« Edited: October 03, 2005, 03:17:27 PM by Q »

Aye, of course, on Senator MasterJedi's amendment.

(for the record)
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

« Reply #6 on: October 03, 2005, 09:58:08 PM »

I propose an amendment:

The bill shall hereby be re-written

Calling this an "amendment" would be generous.  It's basically another bill to replace mine.

Thus Nay.
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

« Reply #7 on: October 07, 2005, 05:55:38 PM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 11 queries.