Census Estimates for 2008 -> 2010 Apportionment (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 09:25:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Census Estimates for 2008 -> 2010 Apportionment (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Census Estimates for 2008 -> 2010 Apportionment  (Read 21500 times)
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

« on: December 22, 2008, 10:53:59 PM »

New York only loses a single seat! That would be quite surprising.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2008, 02:23:38 PM »

Wow, that not that much more needed. If the economy start to get better NC could see that growth. I guess we will have to see.

NC and SC are both in the top ranks for unemployment rates right now... I'm not sure what is hitting South Carolina, but the Charlotte area, at least, is going to have problems with the banking industry. I don't know if these problems are comparatively worse than those in other states or not.

Conversely, NC gains from Florida's losses.

NC and SC has alot of factories that are closing down. Bev Perdue is trying to work out a plan to replace them factory job with bio-tech jobs/greenjobs, or something like that.

And Mark Sanford is letting the market replace them! Tongue

Seriously, I did find it was interesting that NC wasn't gaining anything. Georgia is growing much faster than North Carolina according to the estimates, and SC is growing about the same rate as North Carolina. The Greenville area is really exploding in SC. We're running out of land in Charleston.

Well, NC is growing fastter then GA and SC. You would think NC would get another seat, if both GA and SC got/getting one.

North Carolina only just barely beat out Utah for the last seat in the 2000 Census. So it had further to grow to gain another seat.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2009, 01:18:35 PM »

Florida population growth may have declined to zero.

http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20090228/ARTICLE/902280347

What does this mean for reapportionment if it stays low or in the very low 6 figures through 2010? How about if Arizona has the same experience?

FL-27 is very much on the bubble; if Florida's growth has truly stopped, the state will get only one new seat, not two. That means somewhere, probably Oregon or Minnesota, would get the extra seat.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.