Why dont we just have winner takes all delegates? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 10:00:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Why dont we just have winner takes all delegates? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why dont we just have winner takes all delegates?  (Read 666 times)
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78
« on: March 07, 2008, 12:40:37 PM »
Quote from: Enrico Pallazzo on March 07, 2008, 12:38:52 PM
By your bizarre logic, I guess you can kiss goodbye to Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, Washington, Maryland, Delaware, Connecticut, Vermont and Maine.  Hillary couldn't win those (even closely in many cases), so John McCain must have those "in the bag" too.

Oh, but Clinton would make those up by winning Texas and Arizona, so they don't matter.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.