Are Republicans seriously claiming Romney was right on Obama's Libya comment

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

I'm sorry,  but this is total rubbish...

Obama DID say it was an act of terror, I know, because I watched the press conference live. Obama didn't know it was an organised cell ...

I'll say this once... if you're trying to make Crowley the story... then it's the biggest concession I can think of.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/16/crowley-was-out-of-line/

This is seriously, seriously reaching... again, if that's the best you got...

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

You think arguing about the placement of a phrase in a statement... is going to be the story tomorrow?

Ah, ha.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

I think the story will the GOP whining about the moderator... and even if the specific story gets a lot of exposure - they play the video of Obama's speech, which wraps Benghazi VERY clearly into the 9/11 discussion.

There was no epic lie.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

While I'm hurt by your intellectual superiority... you haven't made a comment that discredits the president's story.

The president referred to Libya as 'an act of terror', but if you don't realise that there is a huge difference between 'an act of terror' and a planned act undertaken by a specific organised terrorist cell. An act of terror doesn't have to be undertaken by an organised terrorist cell.

It took 14 days to confirm it as a clear act perpetrated by a terrorist cell, as opposed to what they mistakenly thought was an act of terror brought about by incitement from the video and related to the video....

They are different...