CO: Rasmussen: Udall only ahead by 3 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 09:57:43 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 Senatorial Election Polls
  CO: Rasmussen: Udall only ahead by 3 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CO: Rasmussen: Udall only ahead by 3  (Read 6261 times)
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

« on: July 22, 2008, 06:08:53 PM »

Schaffer doing well at the debate probably helped him. Observe.


http://youtube.com/watch?v=aT2SIadYPmQ
WOW, that is all I can say.  LOL @ Udall supporters for not knowing what he thinks at all
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2008, 09:21:42 PM »

Lief, its called a statistical tie
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2008, 09:26:29 PM »

They're within the margin of error, yes, but he's still technically ahead. I didn't say it was a giant lead or anything, but to say that there's no chance Merkley wins at this point means that you're ignoring the facts.
To say Merkley does not have a chance is not ignoring the facts, polls are not facts, especially one poll.  And technically he's not ahead, technically its a tie.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2008, 06:41:23 AM »

They're within the margin of error, yes, but he's still technically ahead. I didn't say it was a giant lead or anything, but to say that there's no chance Merkley wins at this point means that you're ignoring the facts.
To say Merkley does not have a chance is not ignoring the facts, polls are not facts, especially one poll.  And technically he's not ahead, technically its a tie.
What? That's an incredibly convoluted sentence. Are you insinuating that Merkley doesn't have a chance?
He has about the same chance as others who are polling close like Zimmer, Musgrove, Franken and Tom Allen.  The chance would be so minimal that it is not worth noting.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.