2008: Paul v/s Clinton (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 11:36:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  2008: Paul v/s Clinton (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2008: Paul v/s Clinton  (Read 1282 times)
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

« on: December 02, 2007, 03:10:51 PM »

With more name recognition, Ron Paul has a shot to win this.  The dislikes are incredibly high on Hillary so no way he gets less than 45%.  He also is a candidate that would fire up his base and certainly bring over people from the other side of the aisle.  Paul selects Huckabee as his running mate touting his flat tax proposal, and Hillary picks Richardson.  Final result:



Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

« Reply #1 on: December 02, 2007, 03:54:32 PM »

With more name recognition, Ron Paul has a shot to win this.  The dislikes are incredibly high on Hillary so no way he gets less than 45%.  He also is a candidate that would fire up his base and certainly bring over people from the other side of the aisle.  Paul selects Huckabee as his running mate touting his flat tax proposal, and Hillary picks Richardson.  Final result:





No way Paul takes CA.
I think he wins a lot of the ultra-liberal vote in areas like San Francisco, taking something like 30% in San Francisco.  Hillary's high disapprovals allow him to seek a huge upset here.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 11 queries.