Guess liberty's just for the straight white man, huh?
Not really. The question asked about "gay marriage", I vehemently oppose gay marriage. I am neutral on civil unions, although I personally oppose them.
Never mind gay marriage. You have no logical argument against gay adoption. They are not going to molest their kids anymore than any other group. They're not going to 'turn them gay.' And no, 'they'll get picked on' isn't a valid argument either. If someone is getting picked on because their parent(s) are a minority you take that out on the people doing it, not the parents.
That isn't really my argument at all, I personally just feel that kids are better off being placed into 2 parent stable families when applicable. If a gay couple does not have a civil union, I don't like the child being placed into an environment where the couple is not legally intertwined
Its funny how liberals think gays are so important but don't give a damn about innocent children
I'm not a liberal. I do take issue with the idea that something that doesn't even have a brain yet is a 'child' worthy of more rights than actual adults. Like most sane americans.
Besides that you said racial profiling was OK. I don't know about anyone else, but I personally see the right to not be harassed because of the color of your skin to be a pretty basic civil liberty. If the cops are looking for a minority suspect that's fine but we should not be discriminating against people when a crime hasn't even been committed yet.
[/quote]
I know your not a liberal, the comment wasn't directly for you but in general. And an unborn being killed for no reason does not equate to not giving a privilge a group of minorities that isn't even a government issue. As far as racial profiling, it makes no sense not to, if a group of crime experts (similar to w/e that thing is on Criminal Minds) thinks that a certain ethnicity committed the crime, don't interview everyone in the name of "fairness"