Pacific Legislature Official Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 09:54:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Pacific Legislature Official Thread (search mode)
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: Pacific Legislature Official Thread  (Read 265538 times)
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #25 on: October 01, 2008, 12:33:13 AM »

Where will we get the money to cover the reduction in sales taxes?

I caught a leprechaun.
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #26 on: October 04, 2008, 07:13:10 PM »

Reduction of Regressive Taxation Act - Aye
Alkyl Nitrites Deregulation Act - Nay
The Awesome Recognition Act - Aye
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #27 on: November 30, 2008, 11:12:40 PM »

So... anyone have any bright ideas?

Or should I just commision the building of gold statues in the likeness of B celebrities?
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #28 on: December 01, 2008, 06:18:01 PM »


Agreed. I would like to hear some arguements before even considering to bring it up for a vote.
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #29 on: December 04, 2008, 08:38:19 PM »

Competition in Races is a Good Thing Act

Findings: Competition is good

Section 1: If in a race for a Pacific governmental position there is only one candidate or there is no candidate a potato will be be chosen to be a secondary option (or primary) option. After the election if said potato is elected it will retain the post.

-----
Instead of having empty positions we might as well put something in there...
Wink

I will formerly introduce this for a vote in a few days. Truthfully I don't even know if it is constitutional though it would be fun to see if a potato could beat certain candidates.
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #30 on: December 05, 2008, 06:32:17 PM »

We are now voting on the following:

----------------------------------------------
Competition in Races is a Good Thing Act

Findings: Competition is good

Section 1: If in a race for a Pacific governmental position there is only one candidate or there is no candidate a potato will be be chosen to be a secondary option (or primary) option. After the election if said potato is elected it will retain the post.
---------------------------------------------
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #31 on: December 07, 2008, 07:31:13 PM »

Fine Xahar, we will vote on your amendment...

Motion to amend:

Competition in Races is a Good Thing Act

Findings: Competition is good

Section 1: If in a race for a Pacific governmental position there is only one candidate or there is no candidate a potato Xahar will be be chosen to be a secondary option (or primary) option. After the election if said potato Xahar is elected it will he shall be allowed to retain the post.

This would be constitutional.

Please vote Aye, Nay or abstain.


----------------------------------
Nay
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #32 on: December 09, 2008, 02:19:12 PM »

So... anyone else want to get involved and vote? Or should Xahar and I just declare a benevolent dictatorship?
Wink
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #33 on: December 10, 2008, 12:14:26 AM »


Congratulations, you just discovered Pacific Legislature.

Only silly acts, because that is the only power they have.

Every now and then something important comes up, but yes many of the important legislation was passed ealier on (regarding issues such as abortion, the environment and the like).
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #34 on: December 10, 2008, 01:28:08 AM »

[X] Governor CultureKing
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #35 on: December 10, 2008, 09:25:44 PM »

Xahar's amendment has failed by a 1-2 margin.

We sure are getting great participation here...
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #36 on: December 20, 2008, 07:31:45 PM »

We are now voting on the following:

Competition in Races is a Good Thing Act
Findings: Competition is good

Section 1: If in a race for a Pacific governmental position there is only one candidate or there is no candidate a potato will be be chosen to be a secondary option (or primary) option. After the election if said potato is elected it will retain the post.

---------------------------

Third Constitutional Convention Petition

The Pacific Region formally petitions the President of Atlasia to call a Constitutional Convention.


----------------------------------------------------

Please vote Aye or Nay
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #37 on: December 21, 2008, 10:14:56 PM »

Voting on the proposed measures will end in about 20-21 hours.

------


Both: Aye
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #38 on: December 22, 2008, 06:51:14 PM »

Nay
Aye

Voting on the proposed measures will end in about 20-21 hours.

------


Both: Aye

Legislative voting lasts for a week, actually. Smiley

Well, if you insist...
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #39 on: December 27, 2008, 02:40:25 AM »

Voting is now closed, both measures have passed:
------------------------

Competition in Races is a Good Thing Act:
Aye: 5
Nay: 3

Third Constitutional Convention Petition:
Aye: 8
Nay: 0


Governor CultureKing
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #40 on: January 31, 2009, 09:11:40 PM »

(Whistles to self while watching a tumble-weed pass by)

So... anyone want to propose something? Anything?
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #41 on: February 01, 2009, 06:53:10 PM »

Do we have the legal authority to revoke the existence of Bakersfield?

Maybe we can have a non-binding resolution calling for the residents to leave the Pacific and destroy their houses

I was also thinking of perhaps "inviting" British Columbia to join the Pacific....
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #42 on: February 02, 2009, 03:10:05 AM »

I think I would be happy with a proposition to exchange Bakersfield and Oildale for British Columbia.
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #43 on: February 05, 2009, 02:55:52 AM »

The best course for this would simply be a petition right? We probably don't want to act too much like our own nation and invade a sovereign nation, that's the Feds job.
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #44 on: February 06, 2009, 05:33:04 PM »

Pacific Petition to the Atlasian Federal Government:

We the people of the Pacific region appeal to our government and act accordingly. We propose that an exchange takes place between Atlasia and Canada. The Pacific would like to exchange Bakersfield and Oildale for British Columbia. This exhange would be benificial to both nations. The Pacific would become a continous region and gain an area that is culturally simular to much of The Pacific. Canada would gain an area that has a warm climate that could potentially become a vacationing paradise for Canadians.

--------------

Meh? Perhaps we should throw in Fresno...
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #45 on: February 07, 2009, 01:15:35 AM »

What if Canada doesn't buy our used-car-dealer-schtick?  Maybe we could deport them all to Somalia?

The federal government can "convince" the Canadians.
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #46 on: February 10, 2009, 11:19:06 AM »

I have a idea that comes from my "Meeting of Minds" thread.

In order to better take care of the wiki, legislation should be introduced to give the Governor and/or Lt. Governor of the Pacific the responsibilities of updating the Wiki with regard to Pacific Citizens, Pacific Legislation, Petitions from the Pacific Legislature, elections in the Pacific, etc.
I believe that the Lt. Governor is already in charge of that.
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #47 on: February 18, 2009, 05:50:25 PM »

I think I speak for everyone in in the Pacific in the request for you to do this intoxicated.  We'll deal.

Agreed it will probably make for a more interesting Wiki.
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #48 on: March 04, 2009, 05:10:56 PM »

Ok, so here are the candidates to become Pacific Delegates to the Atlasian Constitutional Convention:

-Bgwah
-coffeebeans
-CultureKing
-Lunar
-Marokai Blue
-Maxque
-Meekermariner

---------------------------------

So, how do we want to go about this? Have everyone put their preferences in order? Vote for five and the ones with most votes becomes the delegates?

Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #49 on: March 05, 2009, 12:45:55 AM »

My votes:

Bgwah
CultureKing
Marokai Blue
Meeker
Lunar
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 13 queries.