leading 2012 GOP presidential candidates as of early 2009? (user search)

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? June 03, 2024, 12:51:26 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion

Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)

leading 2012 GOP presidential candidates as of early 2009? (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

Pick two of the following who you think will be leading 2012 presidential candidates if the Dems win in '08

#1 Haley Barbour		6 (12.5%)
#2 Richard Burr		0 (0%)
#3 Jeb Bush		13 (27.1%)
#4 Norm Coleman		2 (4.2%)
#5 John Cornyn		1 (2.1%)
#6 Charlie Crist		9 (18.8%)
#7 John Ensign		3 (6.3%)
#8 Rudy Giuliani		1 (2.1%)
#9 Lindsey Graham		3 (6.3%)
#10 Chuck Hagel		3 (6.3%)
#11 Mike Huckabee		5 (10.4%)
#12 Kay Bailey Hutchison		2 (4.2%)
#13 Bobby Jindal		1 (2.1%)
#14 Bill Owens		1 (2.1%)
#15 Sarah Palin		2 (4.2%)
#16 Tim Pawlenty		5 (10.4%)
#17 Mike Pence		7 (14.6%)
#18 Condoleeza Rice		2 (4.2%)
#19 Mitt Romney		2 (4.2%)
#20 Mike Rounds		3 (6.3%)
#21 Mark Sanford		3 (6.3%)
#22 John Sununu		4 (8.3%)
#23 Fred Thompson		5 (10.4%)
#24 John Thune		4 (8.3%)
#25 David Vitter		2 (4.2%)
#26 NOTA		1 (2.1%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 48

Calculate results by number of options selected

Author

Topic: leading 2012 GOP presidential candidates as of early 2009? (Read 18407 times)

AndrewTX
AndrewCT
Junior Chimp

Posts: 7,091

Re: leading 2012 GOP presidential candidates as of early 2009?

« on: June 11, 2007, 01:00:08 PM »

Sorry, but people like Pawlenty, Sanford, Bush and others who are going to be out of office in 2006, 2008, or in 2010 will not make any major impact in the race.

My choices were Palin, Crist, Thune, and Vitter.

Logged

AndrewTX
AndrewCT
Junior Chimp

Posts: 7,091

Re: leading 2012 GOP presidential candidates as of early 2009?

« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2007, 02:23:31 PM »

No, but they bring nothing to the field in 2008, so why would they be any more important in 2012?

Logged

Pages: [1]

Jump to:

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.