WSJ/NBC Poll: Hillary leads McCain with Bloomberg running as an Independent (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 11:57:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  WSJ/NBC Poll: Hillary leads McCain with Bloomberg running as an Independent (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: WSJ/NBC Poll: Hillary leads McCain with Bloomberg running as an Independent  (Read 2548 times)
Deano963
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,866


« on: December 17, 2006, 10:13:58 PM »

3-way:

McCain - 43%
Obama - 38%
Other/Not sure/Neither - 19%

Edwards - 43%
McCain - 41%
Other/Not sure/Neither - 16%

http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/WSJ061213_DEC-2006-poll.pdf

I'm still shocked that McCain only leads Obama by 5%-6% in these polls that keep coming out. As much as 40% of the country has still never heard of Obama and McCain's name recognition has got to be at least 90%.

Surprising that Edwards leads McCain.

This is the part of the poll I found most interesting:

Percentage who said they would be "very uncomfortable" voting for a presidential candidate who fits the following description:


someone over seventy 29

African American 4


AKA the "How uncomfortable would you be voting for John McCain (over seventy) or Barack Obama (African American)" questions. Things are starting to look down for McCain. Maybe Mr. Straight-Talk Express shouldn't have taken a detour through Bullsh**t Town, in the words of Jon Stewart.
Logged
Deano963
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,866


« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2006, 01:31:13 AM »

Another problem for John McCain is that lately he has been very vocal in his call for increasing troop levels in Iraq.  I think this is could come back to bite him in the ass.  If the Republicans nominate a candidate who is that pro-war they'll be committing suicide and if they don't realize that they're even dumber than I thought.

There's a great write-up on Political Insider right now talking about the very same thing. Apparently, John McCain made a political decision long ago to stake out the "we need 15,000-30,000 more troops" position on Iraq so that he could claim that while anti-war candidates oppose the war, none of them have ever actually put forth an alternantive position or plan. McCain, on the other hand, could say, right or wrong, that he had called for more troops to secure Baghdad. But, now that the White House is leaning towards sending more troops to Iraq, McCain could be ROYALLY screwed. You see, McCain never figured in wildest dreams that Bush would be stupid enough to actually send more troops to Iraq. He never thought his bluff would be called. If more troops are sent, and the situation remains just as bad in '08, McCain's policies will easily make him linked to the chaos in Iraq and make it impossible for him to win.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 11 queries.