So who won? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 05:06:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  So who won? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: I got it first!
#1
Bachmann
 
#2
Cain
 
#3
Gringrich
 
#4
Huntsman
 
#5
Paul
 
#6
Johnson
 
#7
Romney
 
#8
Santorum
 
#9
Perry
 
#10
Obama
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 61

Author Topic: So who won?  (Read 2926 times)
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
« on: September 22, 2011, 10:42:34 PM »


You got it first, baby.

I think Mitt Romney struck me as the most Presidential, as these things go.

Although, in answer to the age-old question "which one would you rather smoke a joint with?" I guess I'd have to say Gary Johnson. 
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2011, 11:11:27 PM »

So, among the announced candidates, only Romney can win the nomination?

8 years ago this primary wouldn't be a contest. Not in today's GOP.

16 years ago, it was the custom in the GOP to give the oldest dog the bone.  I don't think that custom has changed.  We go through these "debates" and we'll have a convention, but in the end, there are only a handfull of candidates that have paid the dues.  Those have slogged it out in the winters in the early primaries, in more than one campaign.  And among those, there's really only one who might have a chance, however slim, of defeating Obama. 

It may not be a great way to nominate candidates.  And the corporate-controlled two-party system may not be in our best interests, but yes it seems as though this nomination is Romney's to lose.  And tonight he seemed to be holding his own fairly well.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
« Reply #2 on: September 23, 2011, 09:21:29 AM »


Santorum - Like many others on this forum, I don't understand why he can't gain traction with Republican voters. Consistent and articulate defender of Republican principals and policies, and strong on the attack (even if he can get shrill at times).


His stock keeps going up in my book with every debate.  He's measured, smart, serious, and likable.  Too bad he comes into the race with loads of radical ideological baggage. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 15 queries.