Why is there a desire on the right to get rid or privatize Social Security? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 06:47:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Why is there a desire on the right to get rid or privatize Social Security? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why is there a desire on the right to get rid or privatize Social Security?  (Read 3345 times)
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
« on: December 06, 2010, 09:27:20 PM »

I've seen people on the right treat as if it's handout, welfare, etc, and want to either see it phased out in a sneaky way, outrightly disbanded, or privatized. Why?

whoa, hoss.  You just asked several questions.

The answer to all three probably lies in the fact that it's huge.  Nearly 600 billion dollars.  600 billion.  That's a really, really big number.  If you had 600 billion beer nuts you could cover the state of Texas in beer nuts.  Twice.  Or, if you had 600 billion inches of twine you could wrap that twine about the earth.  376 times.  Well, you get the picture.  On a practical level, 600 billion dollars represents 20% of the federal government's outlay.  It's pretty much like Defense.  600 billion dollars worth of collective debt, cancelled, becomes 600 billion dollars worth of relief.  If you could get rid of just those two little things, SS and Defense, then you'd be set.  We'd start paying down our debt.  Make the DoD and SS disappear, and within 6.93 years, we'd be Back in Black.

Of course, we need a standing Army and Navy.  Unless you're a Libertarian you must agree with that.  And, of course, there are some who haven't made wise decisions with respect to their retirement portfolios, so unless you're a Libertarian you must also agree that we need some sort of safety net regarding retirement.  Therein lies the rub, yes?  How much you rub it really depends upon just how hard you want to make it.

Now, there's also the separate issue of privatization.  That's a completely different question.  We'll get to that later once you have absorbed the initial reasons for concern over the ballooning federal deficit.  And once you have acknowledged that privatization and banishment are two completely different suggestions.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
« Reply #1 on: December 07, 2010, 12:52:31 PM »

Because we would rather keep more of our money and choose to make our own decisions regarding saving for retirement. And the current system cannot sustain itself. Even supports of it will admit that.

(How did defense spending come into the conversation?)

I brought it up.  There are really only two things that are worth 600B to us, apparently, and I wanted to lump them together for the purpose of my diatribe.  It should be noted that the the current system cannot sustain itself in both of those 600 Billion-dollar outlays. 

Also, I agree with your succinct explanation above about privatization or partial privatization. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 11 queries.