The Democrats' Idea Of A General
"DEMOCRATS are so delirious
----pacifist scaredy-cat
----- whether Wesley Clark is sane.
.----" No, wait. I'm sorry. I think that was Clark talking about Monica Lewinsky's dress, not national security intelligence.
Meanwhile, Clark recently said that the "two greatest lies that have been told in the last three years" are: "You couldn't have prevented 9/11 and there's another one that's bound to happen." If he were president, Clark says, there would be no more terrorist attacks.
".......crazier than a March hare. -------- pacifist in uniform, they ignore his Norman Bates strike, raving lunatics
"infernal Democratic presidential primary debates. "
[Ahem, debates are the norm unless running unopposed.......]
" When this peacenik [4-star General, with purple heart from Viet Nam, FYI] criticizes the war in Iraq, he can puff up his puny chest and cite his own glorious experience with blood, sweat and tears in the Balkans. "
That's the Democrats' idea of a general.
--Ann Coulter, Jan. 14, 2004
(irrelevant stuff snipped)
-----------------------------------------
No, it is not an interesting "Read" at all. It is an article of the "cheap shot". It is symptomatic of a once-decent political party in sharp decline------who has adopted clever insults instead of substance---fodder for the uninformed, who while not read, they can certainly recognize an insult and feel a certain smugness over people with real accomplishments.......and so it goes by people like Rush, Coulter, who are paid not by the quality or truth they write but by the number schoolyard names they can come up with. Such people that depend on name-calling automatically can be assumed to be lying and have the weaker argument.
