Kirsten Gillibrand had a better chance of being president 10 years ago (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2024, 08:07:43 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Kirsten Gillibrand had a better chance of being president 10 years ago (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Kirsten Gillibrand had a better chance of being president 10 years ago  (Read 487 times)
ON Progressive
OntarioProgressive
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,106
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -8.70

« on: July 08, 2018, 07:49:57 PM »

Post-transformation Gillibrand can't even poll above two percent in national polling after more than a decade as a high-profile Senator. There's absolutely no reason to believe that her herrenvolk incarnation of 10 years-past would be doing better than, like, John Delaney or something.

The quip re: her BETRAYAL OF ISRAEL is adorable, too, and certainly shreds any credibility the article might've had.

Primary polls this early are meaningless, it's just name recognition. Bernie was polling at 0% in 2014.

This. There are a lot of people who don't even know who their own state's Senators are, nevermind Senators from other states.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 13 queries.