Harris , Gillibrand and Warren endorse packing the Supreme Court (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 04:33:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Harris , Gillibrand and Warren endorse packing the Supreme Court (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Harris , Gillibrand and Warren endorse packing the Supreme Court  (Read 4553 times)
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,070
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

« on: March 19, 2019, 07:21:53 PM »

I guess this is becoming a more mainstream view within the Democratic Party. In theory, I support it, but it's an idea that will almost definitely backfire after awhile. We just need to accept that the Supreme Court and our process for appointing and approving Justices is forever tarnished. Thanks Mitch! I await the day when you're made into turtle soup.
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,070
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2019, 07:30:12 PM »

There's a very easy compromise to avoid this. Gorsuch (or Kavanaugh) steps down and is replaced by Merrick Garland OR a different Democratic appointee if Republicans have a substantive reason to vote him down.

That would be nice...but is even less likely than passing a constitutional amendment reforming the Supreme Court.
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,070
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2019, 07:34:43 PM »

There's a very easy compromise to avoid this. Gorsuch (or Kavanaugh) steps down and is replaced by Merrick Garland OR a different Democratic appointee if Republicans have a substantive reason to vote him down.

That would be nice...but is even less likely than passing a constitutional amendment reforming the Supreme Court.

There have been a few rumors that Roberts was so mad at McConnell for destroying the Supreme Court's legitimacy that he's planning to step down once a Democratic president gets in. Personally I'm pretty skeptical, but we'll see. Getting Obama in as Chief Justice would be pretty great.

Maybe I'm just jaded, but I don't see him doing that as very realistic either. But Obama would definitely get the last laugh in that hypothetical. It would be glorious!
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,070
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2019, 06:48:01 PM »

At this point it's become clear that both sides want to use the Court as a political weapon. I've come to the point where I think it should simply be abolished

It's been that way since its inception though, the Framers just never thought we would ever become this polarized or that their system would be exploited by an eventual Senate Majority Leader from Kentucky. But yes, with how it functions today, something significant needs to change for the good of the country.
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,070
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2019, 06:25:02 PM »

This is a dangerous move that undermines the independence and integrity of our judiciary. The Democrats are increasingly acting like a fringe party. This declaration is declaring war on the independence of our judiciary and by extension, our system of checks and balances, and by extension, our democracy. This preposterous idea should not even be considered, I wonder if Atlas Dems and Dem leadership will do the right thing and disavow these looks and endorse Biden, Hickenlooper, Delaney, or Gabbard.

Let's calm down a little here. I'm not huge on this idea either but it is a reflection of the lack of balance in our politics. McConnell stole an appointment and violated our institutional norms first, now Democrats are looking to rectify that decision which holds consequences over millions of Americans. Not to mention that Trump tramples on our norms and institutions on a daily basis with little to no resistance from his own party.

Advocating for this idea is indeed a radical move, but it isn't out of selfishness, ignorance, or tribalism. Anyway, if they somehow manage to seize upon doing this (which is unlikely) Republicans will undoubtedly be able to pounce on the precedent and do it themselves too. The high road doesn't exist anymore.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.