Why didn’t Bob Graham’s campaign pick up steam in the 04’ Dem. primary? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 03:50:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Why didn’t Bob Graham’s campaign pick up steam in the 04’ Dem. primary? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why didn’t Bob Graham’s campaign pick up steam in the 04’ Dem. primary?  (Read 395 times)
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,159
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

« on: March 03, 2019, 09:40:14 PM »

You haven't heard of the scandal about the diaries?

It became known that he had a habit of writing down summaries of everything he did on a given day and keeping the hundreds of notebooks that had accumulated over the years. They weren't really "diaries" in a reflective sense - it was often mundane things like what meals he ate, mundane errands he did, etc.

But the press decided this was an incredibly weird, creepy thing to do and he became cast as a quixotic goofball.

Bob Graham voted against the 2002 Iraq resolution, so our pro-war neolib media decided to destroy him with this fake scandal, the same way they destroyed Dean with the "Dean scream".

Not only that, but he called for every Senator to read the intelligence report before voting. His reading it made him decide to vote nay. Leahy also said he voted nay because of reading it. But very few other senators read it.

They were elected to lead, not to read.



To think that our current situation is more ridiculous than that. It's not even funny anymore.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.