In hindsight, who should the Democrats have nominated in 2016? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2024, 10:28:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  In hindsight, who should the Democrats have nominated in 2016? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: In hindsight, who should the Democrats have nominated in 2016?  (Read 12716 times)
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,673
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

« on: March 12, 2018, 06:57:13 PM »

Does no-one remember how Hillary Clinton was the popular former Secretary of State with 60%+ approval, while Drumpf was the race-baiting laughingstock who would lose in a massive landslide if he were somehow nominated?

In another timeline, it may have been Sanders losing to Rubio after being successfully painted as a left-wing extremist, with the consensus being that the "Tea Party of the left" had cost the Democrats a probable win by rejecting the qualified establishment moderate in Hillary Clinton for "McGovern 2.0".

This is definitely true and let's be honest here, Clinton was always going to win as long as she ran. Sanders may have been a surprising opponent but he still lost badly.

In spite of that, if I go with the hypothetical of Clinton not running at all. This would have been Biden's best chance. There was still a somewhat weak bench for the Democrats and if anyone else like a Warren or Booker ran against Biden, he probably would have defeated them still.

 I still don't know if he would win or not though. I think a third term after eight years of a Democratic White House would have been an uphill battle for anyone even against Trump and that doesn't even take Russian interference or other outside factors into account. Obama could have won though. Obama running for a third term would have trounced Trump. That I will say with some confidence.
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,673
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2018, 07:15:47 PM »

What should have happened was have Romney win in 2012, put Hillary against him in 2016, have her lose in a landslide of biblical proportions, then after 8 years of a moderately okay republican president get a reform democrat that I would actually vote for.

I am far from a fan of Romney, but I do think I would prefer this reality to the one we're in now. Maybe I'm just jaded and crestfallen to the point of despair but there is no way that Romney would have been as bad as Trump currently is. We Democrats would probably have had some decent midterm results on top of everything and it wouldn't have felt like we were cheated out of an appointment to Scalia's seat, since it would have rightfully been Romney's. We just would have had to be patient for 2020.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.