Also tobacco is utterly finksing disgusting trash. Sickening worthless garbage. Why should i give an inks if that repellent filth is further restricted?
Your very helpful descriptions of tobacco smoking:
1. Utterly f**king disgusting trash
2. Sickening worthless garbage
3. Repellant filth
do not (and should not) influence broader policy. YOU specifically should care about what happens to groups of people YOU are not a part of because the ramifications of these restrictions could form a precedent where things YOU enjoy but everyone else thinks are 1, 2, or 3 effect YOUR life. Then again, YOU have a unique perspective that overrules everyone else, because YOU are such a little miracle.
I
hate libertarianism. Nevertheless, I do agree that people should be allowed to engage in activities that do not negatively impact others specifically*. I personally find just about zero redeeming qualities about strip clubs and gambling. They are useless, ridiculous activities for imbeciles. That doesn't mean I think you should be 21 to gamble or visit a strip club. All that that means is that
I won't gamble or go to a strip club. Maybe your predilection to such vices causes you to go bankrupt or to leave your partner. Is this something detrimental but preventable for a society or individual? Yes - but that doesn't mean it's the correct action to restrict an adult's participation based on something as asinine and useless as the number of times the earth has revolved around the sun since they burrowed out of their mothers' proverbial.
* I know, I know: Second-hand cancer death apocalypse air. I don't care very much about smoking bans aimed at reducing second-hand smoke. I do care about the government deciding that action A is only permissible to adult group B, though. If you are going to have this hierarchy of age-related permissible activities, at least be consistent. What's the age where someone is accountable for his own actions - 18 or 21?