Why aren't representatives typically seen as presidential material? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 03:39:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Process (Moderator: muon2)
  Why aren't representatives typically seen as presidential material? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why aren't representatives typically seen as presidential material?  (Read 4007 times)
Jay 🏳️‍⚧️
trippytropicana
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 637
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

« on: December 15, 2018, 04:56:34 PM »

They only represent a small percentage of Americans (between 550 and 950 thousand), and an even smaller number of those vote (between 125 and 400 thousand) in elections, meaning their issue bases are more localized, less polarizing, and many Representatives are in safe seats, eliminating a real need to campaign heavily outside of primaries anyways.

There's 435 Representatives, and maybe 20% of them will serve in any higher office such as Governor, Senator, Cabinet, etc.

TL;DR: Too many Representatives, too little exposure.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 10 queries.