The amazing rise of the angry little doctor. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 30, 2024, 10:38:35 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  The amazing rise of the angry little doctor. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The amazing rise of the angry little doctor.  (Read 18547 times)
Ryan
ryanmasc
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 332


« on: November 27, 2003, 04:50:38 PM »
« edited: November 27, 2003, 05:01:39 PM by Ryan »

Look... either you f*** off back to "Free" Republic or some other hell-hole, or you engage in serious discussion and stop clogging the board up with your partizan stupidity.

Thank you


Realpolitik, I must say I'm shocked at the above post. Quite frankly I would have expected more of you; that was quite beneath your level. Sad   I can only hope you were having a particularly bad day and this was an exception to the rule.

I don't want to be holier than thou. I myself have said far worse though not recently and never in this forum. I think I'm better than that now and this is a better forum with higher standards than most. I'd also like to think that we are all decent and intelligent human beings here and can work out differences like reasonable people.

Regarding partisanship, if there is anyone here who can confidently say "not a single one of my posts have a hint of partisanship in them or are anything but neutral", let him cast the first stone. Smiley
All of us have our strongly held views and we have expressed them in forms that are likely to have at the very least irritated others. Realpolitik (and I trust this doesnt provoke another string of invective) you aren't blameless either. You will have read some good natured ribbing from me when I felt you werent being too neutral and if you are as smart as I think you are, you will in hindsight have seen that there is a grain of truth in each. Wink

I have read M's post and while it was of course strongly stated I found nothing in it to provoke that reaction. That it would have irritated you ;certainly it would!! It did not irritate me. I found MORE than a little truth in it no matter how strongly stated.
Lets put the shoe on the other foot. Our friends, Migrendel and Bandit; you want to tell me that every post of theirs is a perfectly reasonable and neutral evaluation?? You probably dont. Smiley If you are so committed to a neutral forum how come you never said a word to either?? Could it be because (like M), they never said anything WAY over the top and more importantly you agreed with a lot of what they had to say though it may have been a little strongly stated for your taste??

Well I obviously do not agree with most of what they say, as do not most republicans on this forum. How do I deal with it? On days when I am in a bad mood I simply do not read their posts. I read them later (though with a pinch of salt Wink) because I want to be open to all ideas and learn about how very different people view things. Today I was happy to find an issue on which I totally agreed with Migrendel.
If on the other hand you feel you have nothing to gain from M's posts, here's an idea; dont read them!!
Or if you cant avoid that do what the forum rules state and report the message to moderator and let him decide. I trust Dave's judgment, dont you??

Anyways I've gone on for a long time on this but I felt it needed to be said. Smiley Smiley





Logged
Ryan
ryanmasc
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 332


« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2003, 04:27:16 PM »

Also, thank you Ryan for sticking up for me! I never intended the post to be nonpartisan, if I did you might have a solid beef with me. There was a bit of my own wry sense of humor in there, coupled with my somewhat biased take on historical events. Nevertheless, It was not a personal attack against anyone, including herr realpolitik, nor did it contain any intentional falsehoods.

No probs, I'd stick up for any member of the forum when the assault is undeserved, including Realpolitik Cheesy

Just for the record I like your posts. Wink They are pretty funny and very well written (as to use of language and expression)
As you say you dont make any attempts to be non-partisan  as most of us TRY to do and as you also have noted your language isnt the gentlest possible.
Given that this is a non-partisan forum maybe you could work on that without losing the essence of your input. Any posts which are solidly partisan you might want to put in General discussion where I have set up a thread precisely for people to do just that. (Democrats and Republicans-A broad Discussion. )- for specific topics you can set up separate threads which people dont have to open is they dont want to.

Still I can affirm that you have not broken any rules of common decency like using invective or swear words.

Nothing you have said nor the tone is unprecedented on this forum. Several others - (majority liberal-democrat) have done the same without exciting many heated replies from Reps and not a single reprimand from fellow lib Dems Wink

Anyways I personally welcome all points of view and ideologies; gives me something more to learn Grin

Logged
Ryan
ryanmasc
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 332


« Reply #2 on: November 30, 2003, 03:03:11 AM »

LOL not to mention he likes Margaret Thatcher. ;)I saw that thread just after I posted and said "Ah! this is whats got me ole pal Realpolitik all het up" Cheesy

Anyways, alls well that ends well, look forward to this discussion progressing Smiley

I had had a long day and he was beginning to annoy me.
The title of this thread flipped it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 16 queries.