FT 7-06: Bank of Fremont Act (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 01:04:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  FT 7-06: Bank of Fremont Act (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: FT 7-06: Bank of Fremont Act (Passed)  (Read 2557 times)
Coastal Elitist
Tea Party Hater
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,252
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.71, S: 2.26

« on: May 28, 2018, 07:18:33 PM »

I have concerns with this. With government owned banks decisions are driven by politics instead of economics. In the 1800's there were many state owned banks and they all failed miserably at the expense of the taxpayer. Studies have found that state run banks lower economic growth.
Logged
Coastal Elitist
Tea Party Hater
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,252
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.71, S: 2.26

« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2018, 02:17:32 AM »
« Edited: June 02, 2018, 10:59:35 AM by Coastal Elitist »

The Bank of North Dakota is a massive subsidy to the fossil fuel industry. A bulk of its below market lending has been to the fossil fuel industry. This is typical of government-owned banks, which tend to subsidize the powerful and connected. Additionally, much of the bank's credit risk is ultimately shifted to the federal government, particularly through its federally guaranteed student loans.

Research has been done that shows that higher government ownership of banks is associated with slower subsequent development of the financial system, lower economic growth, and, in particular, lower growth of productivity. https://goo.gl/6PppqG

Another issue is that the vast majority of funding for the Bank of North Dakota comes from the state's deposits, much of which is generated from tax and fee revenue. The bank is able to offer below-market rate loans to borrowers because it pays the state less interest on its deposits.

This is essentially a hidden subsidy. Had North Dakota kept its deposits with private banks, it would have received more interest on its deposits. The setup therefore functions as a transfer from taxpayers to borrowers. Rarely is such a lack of transparency in the interests of the general public.
Logged
Coastal Elitist
Tea Party Hater
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,252
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.71, S: 2.26

« Reply #2 on: June 06, 2018, 05:02:00 PM »

We've passed the 72-hour mark... any more arguments or comments?

More government within my mind is a good idea. Wink Time to start pushing back against the small government types that want to abolish all government that has done nothing but fail these past 40 years. A central Bank for Fremont would be a great idea as it would provide stability within the banking sector. I'll vote for it!

House member Trumpsucks,
Reseach shows that government ownership of banks is not a good idea. It's not me saying this. I'm going off the research.
Logged
Coastal Elitist
Tea Party Hater
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,252
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.71, S: 2.26

« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2018, 12:53:32 AM »


As for "lack of transparency," I feel as though our last amendment addressed this problem.  All activities of the bank will be public record and posted on a weekly basis, with a mandatory annual audit from Parliament.  The people's money will remain the people's money.
Where is that in the bill. I'm not seeing that.
Logged
Coastal Elitist
Tea Party Hater
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,252
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.71, S: 2.26

« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2018, 01:43:23 PM »

I guess everyone wants to ignore research.

Nay
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 11 queries.